Book Discussion: Mosaic - 4. to centralize or decentralize?

This post is part of a weekly series based on Patrick Nachtigall's new book, Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God. You are invited to read the book along with me and contribute to the discussion in the comments.

"As the Church of God has grown, it has never reconciled itself with its need to create organizations, structures, and institutions. This has been the Achilles heel of the Church of God" (97). In chapter 4 Nachtigall attempts to take on this problem and provide new perspective to it, including the observation that there are many among us that are "reconfiguring and reimagining themselves organizationally in order to stay relevant and effective" (99). Yet, in all of this there is tremendous irony: We "started with a nondenominational, decentralized paradigm and then entered into a more centralized one out of necessity, only to find that the most effective organizations in the new millennium are radically decentralized" (107f).

Nachtigall's journey includes a look at a strong regional organization within the Church of God (i.e. Oregon / Southwest Washington) and a visit with then General Assembly chair Bob Moss. Intertwined with these interviews he outlines many of the historical factors that have got us to where we are today organizationally. But, the most intriguing part of this chapter is his visit to Bolivia where he discovers a national church that intentionally operates close to a New Testament model, with a flat and flexible structure. Interestingly, this anomaly among us is the result of an independent group of churches that joined us after being attracted to our understandings on holiness and the church. They have little of our movement's DNA in them and as a result have had greater freedom to live out their cooperative ministry in fresh, new ways.

Overall this is a strong chapter, and it does identify one of the key challenges facing us. We have not been able to resolve our idealistic teachings on the church with the practical needs for structure and accountability. And because of this we "have paid a steep price for our lack of clearly-defined structural expectations" (121). The irony that Nachtigall identifies is on the mark and does identify the conundrum we must work through. If we could only find healthy, biblical ways to be accountable to one another our perspective on the church would provide a powerful basis for new organizational effectiveness in an increasingly post-modern, decentralized world that values networks over hierarchies.

I believe that despite occasional steps backward, there are some positive signs that we could be moving in this direction. The ultimate express of it will be when we come to terms with the role of "Anderson" (i.e. Church of God Ministries) alongside our local congregations, regional bodies and many other networks and associations through we which we minister and find expression.

Book Discussion: Mosaic - 3. how should we then teach?

This post is part of a weekly series based on Patrick Nachtigall's new book, Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God. You are invited to read the book along with me and contribute to the discussion in the comments.

Following his look at the emerging generations in the Church of God, Nachtigall naturally moves on to a related topic: The education and training of leaders for the future. Following his previous argument he asserts that "A denomination or movement can preserve its theological identity by have scholastic institutions that educate a new generation of pastors and laypeople in their theology" (67). But, the reality is that the number of young people seeking to enter professional ministry is in rapid decline. This does not bode well for us.

To set the stage for all of this, Nachtigall does a great job of providing a helpful overview of the larger theological landscape in which the Church of God finds itself. Things are much more complex than they were when our movement was founded in the midwestern United States in the late nineteenth century. Today there are three theological worlds around us: traditional, post-Christian and "Book of Acts world" (65). Despite the challenges "Church of God theology is structured very well to reach all three worlds" (66).

The book's approach is to travel across the Church of God to see how various segments of our movement are addressing these challenges. The journey in this chapter is expansive. He starts in the post-modern influenced city of Portland, Oregon, home to Warner Pacific College. Both here and in his next stop, Anderson School of Theology, Nachtigall discovers that there are young people passionate about ministry, but a growing proportion are "shrinking away from pastoral ministry" (75). New models of church and ministry are capturing their attention instead. This is forcing institutions like our seminary to examine what ministerial and theological education will need to look like in the future.

The challenge of the complex theological world needs also to be seen alongside the conventional North American models. Nachtigall shares his visits to the German church in post-modern Europe, Kima International School of Theology in Kenya, and Thailand. The chapter concludes with a fascinating look at the unique leadership development models among our African American churches.

In all, this is an excellent survey of where the Church of God is in terms of ministry education and training, but few real solid recommendations are presented. From Nachtigall's overview I see two main points that must be part of our future roadmap. First, we must come to terms with the complex worldviews around us that have serious impact on our theological approaches and ministry. Our educational institutions must be flexible enough to meaningfully take on the culture within their context. Sadly, I am not convinced that we have always been as open to this happening as it needs to be. The second challenge for the future concerns models of leadership development and theological education. The examples in this chapter demonstrate that there are viable approaches other than the current college/seminary model that is becoming largely obsolete. This cannot be divorced from what needs to happen at the local church level (as Dr. Jay Barber points out on pages 73-74). In other words, as the church changes (either by design or necessity) our educational training must be closely in step. But, I question whether we are doing enough to make this happen.

Book Discussion: Mosaic - 2. boomers, xers, and y should i care?

This post is part of a weekly series based on Patrick Nachtigall's new book, Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God. You are invited to read the book along with me and contribute to the discussion in the comments.

Now that he's set the stage, Nachtigall goes on to explore some of challenges that we face, and he begins with one of the most obvious in the church today: The Generational Challenge. But, he goes beyond just framing it as a generational gap. Instead he sees it as a matter of "the Church is God is not being transmitted from one generation to another" (25). He makes the case that we are missing three generations: the Millenials, Generation X, and what might be a surprise to some, the Baby Boomers. The Greatest Generation still makes up the strongest core of our movement, but that center is aging and losing its influence.

Nachtigall's journey examining these realities begins in my backyard, Seattle. Here he interviews some senior Church of God saints who readily share their feelings of loss for our identity and community. Reading these stories I certainly feel the pain these ladies sense, a common expression by many older individuals in our churches. Then he heads to the International Youth Convention which provides a radical contrast to the perspectives and ministries of the older generation. IYC is, in my assessment, one of the most powerful national ministries that we have, but once kids return home (as they will again next week) will they truly have a place in their local congregations and in leadership? Nachtigall seems to ask the same questions.

To round out the journey examples are also shared from Uganda and the Dominican Republic, both places that seem to deliberately integrate young people into both the church of today and tomorrow.

This chapter provides a insightful overview and analysis of the generational challenge. Apart from the examples given, there still is little overwhelming evidence that we are doing everything we need to do in order to see the next generation carry the Church of God torch into the future. Many churches attempt to deal with this by creating specialized youth programs, but often these are silos isolated and insulated from the broader church. Nachtigall recognizes this inadequate approach when he states that "We are concerned about preserving our identity, but have we done enough to pursue those who will carry it on into the future" (46). I think the answer is a strong "no", certainly making this one of the greatest challenges we currently face.

Chog.org is down

Wednesday morning the service provider for Church of God Ministries experienced a major hardware failure leading to the grounding of several websites, including the main site, chog.org. Others are also affected including the site for IYC (which is real bad timing since the event is next week) and the many congregations whose sites are hosted by CHOG Webhosting.

Obviously ministry still goes on, Internet or no Internet. But, what I find fascinating is the thought that if this would have happened 5 or 10 years ago few would have cared or noticed. The impact today is much greater.

Book Discussion: Mosaic - 1. the beginning or the end

This post is part of a weekly series based on Patrick Nachtigall's new book, Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God. You are invited to read the book along with me and contribute to the discussion in the comments.

Chapter 1 of Mosaic is the true introduction to the book as Nachtigall sets the stage for his journey. He begins at a family cemetery in South Dakota and ponders whether or not this setting is indicative of the future of the Church of God. In doing so he begins to identify some of the challenges we face, and suggests "that we will not be able to move forward in unity until we have a better grasp of the variety within the Church of God and meet the faces behind the various positions, divisions, and communities." (6) Our challenges are not unique as they can be seen in a number of Christian denominations. But, the Church of God does have its own culture and theology that has contributed to some of the problems we face. To illustrate this Nachtigall provides a brief, but helpful, review of the beginnings of our movement.

The real issue we face is the diminishing of "our sense of unique identity" (19). We used to have a strong identity but its steady erosion has left us in a "precarious position" (21). The social and religious landscape has changed around us and the question is whether or not we can respond to these shifts in order to be a viable and strong movement within God's larger church. Nachtigall's journey recorded in the rest of the book will demonstrate if this is at all possible.

The real insights will begin to appear in the subsequent chapters, but Nachtigall does a great job of identifying the core issues in this first one. I see two particular themes emerging which he certainly presents but not overtly: internal diversity and external cultural shifts. These seem to be the greatest challenges that we face. We are no longer a homogeneous people, and therefore it is increasingly difficult to corral such an expansive movement that is no longer contained within a limited geography and demographic as was the case 100+ years ago. This is the result of the growth of the Church of God, but also reflects the changes in the world around us. These external shifts have influenced us and sadly we have not responded well to them. I look forward to seeing how the book unfolds, and the examples he shares that will provide us hope and models for the future.

What do you think of this chapter's description of the issues?

As you read this are you feeling hopeful or discouraged?

North American Convention - Reflections

The 2010 NAC is now history, and I, like hundreds of others, am returning home.

Notice I said "hundreds" of others. Years ago it would have been accurate to assume that "thousands" from outside of Anderson converged on the city, but that is probably no longer the case. (Although, combined with the many who came to the convention through the virtual miracle of the Internet, maybe those numbers could be used!) While the last two NAC's have seen a slight reversal from the 3-5% annual attendance decline that has taken place over the past ten years, the question on most people's minds is whether or not this event can be sustained long term. Monday's townhall began yet another process to evaluate this gathering, but this time status quo is not really an option. I still believe that a major rework has to take place to reflect the current reality across the church. (I still stand by my proposal three years ago).

The uncertain future of the NAC should not, however, overshadow the significance of what did happen this year. Those in attendance experienced a movement that, while still trying to find its identity, is showing signs of health and resolution. This convention should leave almost everyone with a confirmation of what God is doing among us.

The services, in particular, lived up to their prominent place in the agenda. The move to Reardon Auditorium and Park Place church worked well, and as I stated earlier this week the implementation of the alternative service format was overall very successful and contributed to a heightened spiritual climate. The opportunity to create worship environments without trying to appease everyone really allowed the respective worship leaders to provide more meaningful experiences. And, the concert hall acoustics in Reardon made a phenomenal difference. Musically, this was one of the best conventions in many years.

For now the North American Convention is one of the best vehicles we have to draw us together, even though its relevance is declining rapidly. This year's edition, at minimum, gives us hope that better days are ahead and keeps the flame of our reformation movement alive.

(On a further note, it was interesting to note that this year saw continued increase in Twitter activity during NAC. It was fun to keep up with others during the week, and even to make some personal connections because of it)
 

North American Convention - Wednesday

It's hard to believe that we've already arrived at Wednesday, the last day of the NAC. For me the hectic pace of meetings, etc. has made the past five day go by in blur!

For many the day began with the last session of the General Assembly. As outgoing Chairperson Bob Moss stated there were no "crashes" again this year, making this a rather uneventful meeting. A number of minor bylaw amendments were voted on today, as was a resolution presented regarding the National Day of Prayer. Regarding this latter item I hope to post specifically on it next week.

Once G.A. and the morning service are over things begin to move into disassembly mode. Some people begin returning home, and displays are taken down. Everyone gets ready for the closing service, which is typically well attended, largely because of a number of Anderson locals showing up. Tonight's service featured General Director Ron Duncan preaching on one of his favorite topics: the need for interconnectedness in the church. Ron was in a relaxed mode tonight, probably because of the pressures of the week mainly over, and it showed in his preaching. He was actually funny, with some impromptu moments of levity that allowed us all to share in some hearty laughter. While most of it was not intentional, it actually contributed to drawing us together! But, the evening was also marked with powerful worship and the concluding candlelight service that seemed to have extra significance this year.

Tomorrow I will share my overall reflections of the event.

North American Convention - Tuesday

Tuesday is General Assembly day at the NAC, the occasion where we gather to conduct the corporate, national business of our movement. The big change this year is the move back to Park Place church for the General Assembly, something that was regular occurrence 20+ years ago. My G.A. experiences up to this point have always been in Reardon so I don't know how Park Place worked in the past, but no one I talked was pleased with the step backward. The church was packed, with a number of people standing at times. It was very warm, as the air conditioning couldn't keep up even on this moderate summer day. And, the pews are far from comfortable. My assumption is that in order to keep the services at Reardon (along with the instruments and appropriate sound equipment) they decided on this change. But, it didn't work and hopefully next year we'll be back across the street.

Apart from the venue, General Assembly was a positive experience. We have learned to conduct business in an orderly, efficient and civil fashion. And, the good news concerning our financial situation helped make the uncomfortable seating a little more bearable. My only real complaint about the meeting itself is that sometimes I think the General Assembly borders on selling programs instead of reporting. Having a captive audience makes it tempting to use the opportunity for publicity and marketing, which can frustrate attendees. I believe this is one of the reason that attendance drops off as the day progresses.

There were several important announcements today. One is the launching of CHOG Ministry Connector, a new website to link churches and ministers for ministry positions. Also, the Communion together publication was unveiled. This is an expanded version of the Communion tabloid that has been published in recent years for pastors. Communion together has a wider range of articles in a 24 page newsletter format. It is definitely an improvement and should fill a gap in our communications, at least for those leaders desiring printed news and teaching.

Today's theme was based on the "Free" transformational aspect (i.e. stewardship). Tonight's message was brought by Tom Dougherty, a pastor who has taught and implemented good stewardship practices in his own congregation.

North American Convention - Monday

Today was a great day for convention goers to take advantage of a large menu of available conferences. For me, the School of Theology's Doctrinal Dialogue is an annual tradition. For the second year in a row a "Town Hall" meeting with General Director Ron Duncan and General Assembly Chair Bob Moss was held. Opportunities were provided for individuals to ask questions about things happening at Church of God Ministries, and the second half was devoted specifically to the matter of the future of the NAC (led by an outside consultant that has been hired to lead the process). Attendance was strong, and the discussions were polite and largely subdued (perhaps too much).

Tonight's service included the annual commissioning of missionaries, always a NAC highlight. Dr. James Earl Massey was the speaker and, as usual, delivered a strong message, emphasizing the importance of our connections within the Body of Christ. I chose to attend the Park Place service. As I reported yesterday this is an alternative venue that provides a more traditional worship experience. And, as I discovered, it was done very well with such familiar names as Paul Yerden and Dean Schields in leadership. It was obvious from their enthusiastic participation that the largely older demographic was at home singing familiar hymns (even using the hymnal!) with piano and organ accompaniment. And the coordination to connect to the sermon video feed from Reardon was almost spot on. I think this works!

North American Convention - Sunday

Sunday is a fairly laid-back day at the NAC. In the morning attendees are encouraged to attend one of the local Church of God congregations, most of which tend to swell on this day. There are minimal conferences during the day. But, by Sunday evening things start moving into full gear as many more people arrive in Anderson. The evening service has become a highlight of the convention as churches across the continent (and to a certain extent, the world) tune in online to participate in the Global Communion celebration. Tonight lived up to expectations. Fantastic music, and a very powerful sermon by Randy Bargerstock, who challenged us with "Permeating to Transform", calling us to permeate our world (i.e. definitely one to watch on online archive or on DVD purchase). Following the service there was also the annual Heritage Sing-A-Long.

Last night I indicated that Park Place was being used as an overflow venue. Tonight a new twist was introduced. Park Place participants were offered a different worship experience (i.e. more traditional), with only the sermon brought in through video. This is interesting for two reasons. First of all this has been hardly promoted. Earlier I had heard rumors that this was happening, but there were few other indications of this. It was mentioned at the beginning of tonight's service at Reardon, but even the program booklet contains no reference to an alternative service, with the exception of one obscure, passing statement. Very strange. The other interesting point of this innovation is that it marks the first time in NAC history that an alternative worship service was provided. It certainly reflects our times and is a further indication that in the midst of our growing diversity it is unrealistic to expect that a worship service can be the basis of or primary expression of our identity or unity.

I'd better get to bed. Tomorrow is a full day!

Book Discussion: Mosaic - Introduction

Since getting my hands on Patrick Nachtigall's new book yesterday, I have had a hard time putting it down. Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God is a profound book and a "must read" for anyone interested in or concerned about our movement. In my opinion, this is the most important writing on the Church of God since Merle Strege's I Saw the Church in 2002.

Because of its significance I want to enter into a comprehensive dialogue over the issues that Nachtigall raises, and this means more than just a simple, one-post review. I want to invite my blog readers to read this book together and enter into an ongoing discussion over the next few months. Of course, you can also comment on the book's own website: www.chogmosaic.com

If you are ready to join me in this discussion the obvious first step is to obtain a copy of the book as soon as possible. If you are at the North American Convention be sure so pick up a copy at the Warner Press tent (and get it signed tonight by Patrick himself!). Otherwise, order your copy either from Warner Press or Amazon to get started. Every Sunday I will post on the next chapter and hope that you will interact with me on the observations and analysis we discover in the book.

While not everyone may have a copy of the book yet, I want to get started today with the brief introduction. Here Nachtigall describes his intent and method of approach. Ultimately, everything goes back to the question he opens the book with: "Is the Church of God reformation movement finished?"(xi) While he doesn't yet answer the question directly it is evident that he is not convinced that the answer has to be affirmative. But, in order for us to have a bright future it is essential that we at least become aware of the realities we face. In this way our "fragmented community" can "get to know each other all over again" (xiii) and move toward a new future. Nachtigall brings this awareness to us through the stories of Church of God people around the world and presents them here for us to ponder.

I look forward to the Journey and having you with me!

North American Convention - Saturday

While technically Friday evening's Anderson University musical service marks the beginning of the NAC, the effective beginning is Saturday. And, having arrived late last evening, it was on this hot and humid Indiana summer day that the convention began for me.

Saturday is a busy day for me at the NAC, mainly taken up with meetings related to my role as an Area Administrator. And, of special significance for me was getting to hear Patrick Nachtigall address us. While he didn't actually rehash his new book for us (that is available at a separate conference on Sunday) he did share a provocative analysis of the state of the Church of God globally as he discovered it from his extensive travel and research. In short, he says that internationally we are "mostly in chaos" and he attributes that largely to the less than desirable aspects of our movement's DNA that have been uncritically transmitted to other cultures. These aspects include autonomy, suspicion of strong leadership, resistance to strong organizational structure, and lack of accountability. Nachtigall's assessment is far from simplistic. He clearly reads the situation and offers numerous well articulated insights. Ultimately he sees his book as not providing the solutions, but "a realistic platform for dialogue". I obtained my copy today and look forward to reading it as soon as possible along with posts here.

One of the most obvious changes at this year's convention is the new venue setting. Ever since the demise of Warner Auditorium we have been trying to find a new home in Anderson. The Kardatzke Wellness Center worked for a few years, but the annual setup cost was ridiculous. Last year's spread across the city (including evening services at Madison Park church) worked, but took away from the event's cohesiveness. It looks like they may have found a solution that will work for the foreseeable future (or at least until they move this event out of Anderson - but I digress!). Most everything is concentrated in one corner of the Anderson University campus, with Reardon Auditorium and Park Place church as the main gathering hubs. A two-block section of 5th Street is closed off to traffic allowing for people to congregate. Display tents are just east of Reardon in the parking lot, making this a great place to hang out. Once people catch on to the new site, and when the weather moderates, this should be a busy hub.

Tonight's keynote service was the first opportunity for this congregating to take place. The service actually takes place at Reardon Auditorium, but Park Place is setup with high-quality, live video feed as an overflow. The latter was not really needed tonight, as Reardon could have easily accommodated everyone present. When I popped in at the beginning there were only 14 in attendance (plus ushers). That will certainly change in the coming days.

This year's evening services feature Todd Braschler as the worship leader. The setting, along with the outstanding acoustics, provided a comfortable and familiar environment that contributed to a powerful experience. Mitchell Burch spoke tonight, addressing the first of the five transformational statements, "Ignite", which focuses on the Great Commission. In his vibrant, campmeeting style Burch challenged not only us individuals but our larger structures to get in line with God's mission in the world.

Unfortunately, however, reports are that no one else was able to take in last night or tonight's services. That is, cable and Internet broadcasts don't appear to have been working, a big frustration for organizers. Hopefully they will have their technical issues resolved for Sunday evening when many churches across the continent (and even the world) will be watching. [UPDATE: June 27/10: Apparently some were able to watch, but I have heard reports to the contrary]

NAC Coverage

Today I am on my way to Anderson for the North American Convention of the Church of God. As I have done now for several years I will blog daily on my reflections on the NAC. In addition I will expand my Twitter coverage which you can follow @chogblog. (For others tweeting during NAC please use the #nacchog hashtag for easy sharing). For what's it worth I will also be checking in using Google Buzz and will check Google Maps to see if there others around with whom I can connect.

The NAC continues to evolve as an event and so is the Church of God Movement. It will be interesting to watch what happens this year!

Anticipating the Journey

One of the highlights that I await at this year's North American Convention is getting my hands on Patrick Nachtigall's new book that will be released. Mosaic: A Journey Across the Church of God is major project that comes as the result of funding that permitted Nachtigall to travel around the world to "identify the top challenges facing the Church of God movement at the dawn of the twenty-first century". This could be one of the most significant writings from within our movement in many years.

I had an opportunity to talk with Patrick just over one year ago as he was interviewing people for the book. I was impressed with the questions he was asking and the insight he was bringing to the project. An article, which appears to largely summarize his recommendations, is now available on the Church of God Ministries website. Read it to whet your appetite for the book, which itself will be a must read for everyone truly concerned about the future of our movement.

When I get my hands on the book in one week I will post my own review here on CHOG Blog.

UPDATE June 26/10: Check out the book's website at: www.chogmosaic.com

The future of SHAPE

I will finally get back to my discussion on Identity shortly, but I need to comment briefly on a meeting I was at least week in Colorado Springs. The Regional Directors for SHAPE met both to share our experiences and plan for the future. This was a significant meeting on several fronts, especially since it takes place during a time that we transition away from the significant funding that has been provided through the Lilly Endowment. SHAPE (which stands for "Sustaining Health and Pastoral Excellence") has been a tremendous success in the areas in which it has been operating and is expanding rapidly to new regions.

This particular meeting was also important as we had extensive discussions on the future of this ministry. It was recognized that we have to expand SHAPE from just a three-year intensive to a more comprehensive experience that runs throughout a ministers' life-cycle. There are also some perception issues regarding SHAPE that need to be overcome, as it is still not widely understood. In addition, there is work being done on a counterpart ministry, SHARE, that takes the principles of SHAPE to the leadership in a local congregation.

SHAPE is making a difference across the Church of God and is slowly beginning to change our internal culture. It is a vital ministry that has a bright future, especially with the strong national and regional leadership behind it.

The Resurrection of National Denominations

There has been some good discussion (both in the blog comments and with me directly) over the past few weeks on my posts regarding Church of God identity and George Bullard's article on "The Coming Death of National Denominations". I will get to part II of my identity discussion next week, but in the meantime I want to pass along Bullard's prescription to the problem. On his blog he has written two posts regarding "The Resurrection of National Denominations": PART ONE, and PART TWO.

I don't know if Bullard's observations are all relevant or valid for us, but it is definitely worth reading as we examine our own structures. In a similar vein I recommend a book I am currently reading that addresses some of the same issues from a slightly different vantage point: J. Russell Crabtree, The Fly in the Ointment: Why Denominations Aren't Helping Their Congregations and How They Can.

Again, your comments are welcome and desired.

Identity

On numerous occasions over the past few years I have touched upon our identity as a Church of God movement. This is a recurring theme that seems to crop up regularly in our circles as we try to resolve our rich heritage and strong doctrinal convictions with the current reality of our impact and place within the larger Christian community. You can hardly participate in a Church of God gathering without this being discussed, either formally or informally, by our leaders and/or regular folk.

The matter of identity came up again in the most recent issue of Communion, the bi-monthly publication sent to ministers and lay leaders across North America. The feature article, "Rediscovering our Purpose", attempts to tackle the identity problem from the vantage point of purpose. General Director, Ronald Duncan, writes that when we lose our purpose "we lose focus, suffer apathy, and become ineffective". While not directly stating that this fully describes the Church of God today, Duncan does indicate that our "movement needs to discover afresh the power and dynamic drive of a biblical purpose for existence", and he shares several insights about the discovery process. The remainder of the March-April issue contains other articles about rediscovering our purpose, specifically related to such topics as global missions, higher education and worship. Certainly Dr. Duncan is well aware of the crisis we find ourselves in and has been the leading voice in recent years to move us forward in this regard.

I too am concerned about our identity. And, clarity of purpose is an essential part of it. But, I wonder if all the talk about identity and purpose is really strengthening us as a movement. Could it be that the incessant chatter on this topic just reinforces our low corporate self-esteem, and drives us further into discouragement and despair? In fact, it is evident in viewing the lifecycle of any organization that the preoccupation with identity issues usually occurs during times of decline. An organization or movement that has a clear sense of identity, purpose and direction possesses these naturally, because they are inherent within its very culture, not as a result of simply trying to define it.

Our own history demonstrates that identity comes as the result of strong leaders who rally people around a clear, God-inspired vision that is readily understood, articulated and practiced. As we institutionalized and lost our movement impulse we have struggled to define ourselves and our place within the larger church. We are also a much more diverse group of people than what originally emerged from our largely rural, Midwestern roots. In the process we have failed to find a more enduring identity than what was easily formed in the period of sociological and religious upheaval of the late nineteenth century. What is needed is a new, compelling vision that integrates our past, is in sync with present realities, and works toward a new picture of the future.

In a subsequent post I will propose some courses for our identity quest. In the meantime, what do you think about all this preoccupation with rediscovering our purpose?

The Coming Death of National Denominations

Life is finally beginning to slow for me, and I'm ready to get back into full-blogging mode again! Here's a good excuse to start...

Church coach/consultant and General Secretary of the North American Baptist Fellowship, George Bullard, has written a provocative article on "The Coming Death of National Denominations". To what extent does this apply to the Church of God. (Or, maybe it doesn't since we don't consider ourselves a denomination!)

ARTICLE

I'd love your feedback on this. It will lead well into another post I am preparing for the next few days.

2009

As the year comes to a close it is an opportune time to reflect on all that has taken place over the preceding 12 months.

For me, personally, this was a very full year. Besides the demanding nature of my work, our family was preoccupied with the illness and death of my father this summer. And, more recently my step-mother also died after a relatively short, and sudden, illness. Despite the emotional intensity of it all God's strength has been very real. The prayers and support of the church, including a number of you who follow ChoGBlog, is also very much appreciated.

2009 was a significant year for the Church of God. While the limits of my time and energy prevented me from blogging on many of the events, there are several things worth noting from this past year. In particular, the fallout from the financial challenges of 2008 really began to take hold this year. Church of God Ministries is in transition, with numerous personnel changes and adjustments, most notably the departure of Jeannette Flynn. A highlight for us was the North American Convention which saw a number of changes that stemmed the attendance decline, at least for this year.

Looking ahead to 2010, this remains a critical time for our movement. I am concerned that we are increasingly lacking a clear identity and vision that is owned across the very diverse North American church. Discussions in this direction need to continue, and I am committed to using this blog as one vehicle to encourage and stimulate dialogue that will strengthen our respective and cooperative ministries. I am praying that things will settle down in my life to allow this to happen, and as I continue work on my book project.

May God continue to lead and bless you during this coming year!

Missions and administration

Today's announcement by Church of God Ministries regarding new administrative practices for missions projects reminds me to complete my two part reflections on the state and future of missions in the Church of God. I will get to that shortly.

But, today's announcement does reveal the changing landscape which is forcing changes upon our national organization.  In short, CHOGM has decided to begin, in 2010, assessing an 8% administrative fee on a number of missions projects (excluding Living Link) to cover the real costs of implementing these projects. This is a common practice among charitable organizations, but one that we have avoided thus far through the general World Ministries Budget. With giving to the latter in decline CHOGM has little choice but to search for ways to pay for the admininistrative engine that runs behind the scenes.

In principle, I don't have a problem with this decision as donors have to accept the reality of administration, and the overall decline in unrestricted giving has left no obvious alternatives. Of course, not everyone will be as understanding of this decision, which could see even less interest in support of these centralized projects. This should result in new discussions concerning the giving to the CHOGM and its role in missions.

More reason for me to get on to my next blog post...