Tuesday, January 22, 2008

To dance or not to dance?

The Church of God proudly promotes holy living, and for the bulk of our history we have had generally accepted guidelines of what that looks like. Yet, the list of sinful behaviors has changed over the years, and has included obvious vices like smoking and alcohol, and less obvious ones like wearing neckties and even visiting bowling alleys. Dancing is also an activity that has been traditionally scorned, but over time has seen less opposition by movement adherents.

Early this month a major turning point occurred at our flagship institution of higher learning, Anderson University. After years of pressure and coming to terms with its inconsistent policies, AU held its first on-campus dance, a move officially endorsed by the school's board of trustees. Has dancing now joined the list of other practices once shunned, but now accepted, or at minimum tolerated?

The Anderson Herald-Bulletin newspaper has an article detailing this development.

The truth is, despite that a significant contingent of Church of God people think dancing is one of the great sins that leads to all sorts of debauchery, this is no longer the general view held by our membership. While there are forms and presentations of dancing that raise concern, most people recognize that a blanket rejection of it as an activity or art form is not reasonable, and certainly not biblical. We even have congregations across the country who occasionally have dances or offer dancing lessons.

Obviously, the news out of AU is highly disturbing for those Church of God stalwarts who cling to a view of holiness that is all about externalism.

For me the shift in our dancing policies and practices is not the real issue, and not just because I have two left feet and can't dance even if I wanted. The issue is: How are we understanding and practicing what it means to be holy?

Sadly, a thoroughgoing engagement with holiness is not something we do, despite our assertions. Throughout our history we have missed the boat when we have reduced holiness to rigid adherence to individualistic legalism. This misapplication of Scripture flies in the face of the
Spirit-directed life which should mark our lives. The result has been self-righteousness, judgmentalism, and the extinguishing of the Spirit's work. And, hypocrisy abounds especially as it has resulted in a lop-sided holiness that virtually ignores other expressions of a holy life, including our social involvements.

The reaction to this wooden holiness has also not been always helpful. As the Herald-Bulletin article reveals, some of the responses to our restrictions can be reactionary. It is easy for the pendulum to swing too far or for the wrong reasons.

What am I saying in all of this?

I believe that the Church of God must be committed to re-engage in an exploration of what holiness is all about. In doing this we must be prepared to move beyond our constricted views from the past and toward a much fuller understanding as demonstrated by Jesus and expressed in Scripture. This will be one of the topics of my upcoming book.

In the end we may acknowledge that we are a dancing people after all.

4 comments:

David Aukerman said...

Hi Lloyd,

I agree with your comments and reactions to this story. The Church of God is long overdue for a sweeping transformation of its understanding of holiness - away from lists of dos and don'ts, and toward a lifestyle, an attitude, an orientation that is more Christ-like.

For what it's worth, the AU dancing issue is not quite as monumental as it might seem. For years, students have been allowed to organize and attend dances *off campus*. The only change this year is that these dances can now be held on campus. So perhaps the school is becoming more consistent?

I'm in the seminary here at AU, and from my somewhat limited contact with students in the university, it seems like many of the undergraduates who attended the dance were simply standing around most of the time. Culturally speaking, it's kind of funny how teens and college students are so excited to go to "dances" and yet not actually do any dancing...!

--Dave (SeminaryBlog)

Randy said...

wow, I never thought this day would come. Just kidding, I just didn't know when.

I'm from the crop of Andersonians that were allowed to have off campus dances. [Class of '99.] We never understood the concept of allowing dances off campus, but not on.

And Dave, let me just say, my crew and I weren't wall flowers. dunt-tis dunt-tis dunt-tis [Sorry, I don't know the phonics of dance beats.]

I think its pretty ironic for a group of people that has no written doctrine and proud of it, that we live just like our brethren from denominations around us that actually do have lists. I think our current view of holiness is way too narrow or one dimensional. To me it's just acts/works. Sometimes I feel like a pharisee and I've forgotten to clean the inside of the cup. Or that's what I'm pushin' people. The life that Jesus called us to is more rich, more broad, and more whole than that which we preach and live.

Pastor Eric said...

enjoy reading your blog. a fun way to stay engaged with the "serious" church stuff... like should we dance or not :-) Hard on us old guys who grew up in the church of God when dancing was DEFINITELY sinning... you know, dancing, drinking, smoking, chewing and two arms in the air during worship... got to pump some Jethro Tull out the ipod... may make it my song of the day at my blog... "never too old, to rock and roll" you go church of God!

Eric

Anonymous said...

don't dance? man, that's weird.