Now that the North American Convention is over I am reflecting on my experiences and the nature of the whole event itself.
For a long time I have firmly believed that the current format is not appropriate for the times and that a major overhaul is needed. I remain convinced of that. Having always lived at the geographic fringes of our movement I know what it is like to feel that the trek to Anderson is very difficult, if even not worth the effort at times.
I am encouraged to see some of the shifts that are occurring among us. There is a new sense of direction and we are finding ways to relate to each other in healthier ways. I also notice a much greater willingness to explore new methods and options.
Except for "Anderson Campmeeting".
This event has long been a defining moment in our history and corporate experience, so I am not surprised to see a reluctance to tamper with it. But, I believe that it is time to have some honest dialogue, and for our leadership to courageously examine new options that will best serve the church. Unfortunately, I believe there are many people living in denial as to what is really happening at the NAC.
Certainly the NAC is a positive, uplifting, and empowering event. But, the truth is that its role in the life of our movement is greatly diminished. At one time it was, along with the Gospel Trumpet and its reincarnations, a primary symbol of our common purpose and fellowship. For current generations this is much less the case. Attendance seems to be shrinking each year.
I fear that in the next decade we will be forced to confront these realities, and that the NAC may follow the same course as ONEvoice!, with no choice but to cancel it. Unless, of course, we take specific actions today to disrupt that trend.
After considerable thought I want to outline my proposals as to how we could convert the NAC into new, more response events that will touch a larger number of people:
1. Disband the North American Convention as an annual event that meets in Anderson. But, please keep reading.
2. Every second year (i.e. on even years) hold a North American Leadership Conference in Anderson that brings together pastors and other leaders for inspiration, training, and fellowship. The focused nature of this 3-4 day event would provide programs and resource persons of such a high calibre that it would be a significant draw for church leaders. Registration for this event would be based on distance from Anderson to help level the playing field on transportation costs. Those closest to mile zero would pay the most. Those furthest away would be charged no registration fee (or perhaps even receive a grant).
3. Every other year (i.e. on odd years) hold a Church of God convention in a major city in the U.S. The location would change every two years with the intent of moving it about the continent to give everyone a greater opportunity to participate at least once each decade. This would be a 3-4 day event and could be marketed as a part of a vacation opportunity for families.
4. Both of the above events would continue to provide webstreaming of major services to maximize exposure to those who cannot attend.
5. But what about the General Assembly? With the new governance polity the role of the General Assembly has been transformed even further so that now the need for an annual business meeting is not really necessary. The General Assembly could be convened at the Leadership Conference every two years. Let's be real honest here. As a means to conduct business the GA doesn't really work. An extremely small percentage of the total delegated membership ever shows up. In fact, if even 25% of the total possible membership ever showed up, Reardon Auditorium couldn't handle it. And the decisions are made predominantly by those living closest to Anderson. Having lay delegates is an honorable intention, but completely unrealistic. And, if the GA is really nothing more than a public relations event (which it is increasingly becoming) than there are probably other ways that these objectives could be accomplished. Perhaps a new, comprehensive communication strategy?
I think it is time for us to stop ignoring the realities of our current time, and to start taking bold, even radical, steps for the future. I believe that my proposal addresses the issues. If someone else has some better ideas I would love to hear them, but to this point I haven't heard anything being suggested that tackles these challenges.
What do you think?
For a long time I have firmly believed that the current format is not appropriate for the times and that a major overhaul is needed. I remain convinced of that. Having always lived at the geographic fringes of our movement I know what it is like to feel that the trek to Anderson is very difficult, if even not worth the effort at times.
I am encouraged to see some of the shifts that are occurring among us. There is a new sense of direction and we are finding ways to relate to each other in healthier ways. I also notice a much greater willingness to explore new methods and options.
Except for "Anderson Campmeeting".
This event has long been a defining moment in our history and corporate experience, so I am not surprised to see a reluctance to tamper with it. But, I believe that it is time to have some honest dialogue, and for our leadership to courageously examine new options that will best serve the church. Unfortunately, I believe there are many people living in denial as to what is really happening at the NAC.
Certainly the NAC is a positive, uplifting, and empowering event. But, the truth is that its role in the life of our movement is greatly diminished. At one time it was, along with the Gospel Trumpet and its reincarnations, a primary symbol of our common purpose and fellowship. For current generations this is much less the case. Attendance seems to be shrinking each year.
I fear that in the next decade we will be forced to confront these realities, and that the NAC may follow the same course as ONEvoice!, with no choice but to cancel it. Unless, of course, we take specific actions today to disrupt that trend.
After considerable thought I want to outline my proposals as to how we could convert the NAC into new, more response events that will touch a larger number of people:
1. Disband the North American Convention as an annual event that meets in Anderson. But, please keep reading.
2. Every second year (i.e. on even years) hold a North American Leadership Conference in Anderson that brings together pastors and other leaders for inspiration, training, and fellowship. The focused nature of this 3-4 day event would provide programs and resource persons of such a high calibre that it would be a significant draw for church leaders. Registration for this event would be based on distance from Anderson to help level the playing field on transportation costs. Those closest to mile zero would pay the most. Those furthest away would be charged no registration fee (or perhaps even receive a grant).
3. Every other year (i.e. on odd years) hold a Church of God convention in a major city in the U.S. The location would change every two years with the intent of moving it about the continent to give everyone a greater opportunity to participate at least once each decade. This would be a 3-4 day event and could be marketed as a part of a vacation opportunity for families.
4. Both of the above events would continue to provide webstreaming of major services to maximize exposure to those who cannot attend.
5. But what about the General Assembly? With the new governance polity the role of the General Assembly has been transformed even further so that now the need for an annual business meeting is not really necessary. The General Assembly could be convened at the Leadership Conference every two years. Let's be real honest here. As a means to conduct business the GA doesn't really work. An extremely small percentage of the total delegated membership ever shows up. In fact, if even 25% of the total possible membership ever showed up, Reardon Auditorium couldn't handle it. And the decisions are made predominantly by those living closest to Anderson. Having lay delegates is an honorable intention, but completely unrealistic. And, if the GA is really nothing more than a public relations event (which it is increasingly becoming) than there are probably other ways that these objectives could be accomplished. Perhaps a new, comprehensive communication strategy?
I think it is time for us to stop ignoring the realities of our current time, and to start taking bold, even radical, steps for the future. I believe that my proposal addresses the issues. If someone else has some better ideas I would love to hear them, but to this point I haven't heard anything being suggested that tackles these challenges.
What do you think?